Tensions escalated in the global trade arena as President Trump threatened to impose a 10% tariff on goods from BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) in response to what he described as an anti-American alignment at the recent summit. The White House cited concerns over the perceived coordinated effort to challenge existing global trade norms and alliances, viewing BRICS' strengthened cooperation as a direct affront to US economic interests.

China, the largest economy within the BRICS group, responded swiftly but cautiously. In an official statement, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce reiterated the bloc's commitment to promoting multilateral trade and economic cooperation through dialogue and consensus. They firmly rejected the use of tariffs as a means to exert political pressure and underscored the importance of finding mutually beneficial solutions to trade disputes, while emphasizing that BRICS is not seeking confrontation with any nation. This measured response contrasts with Trump's more aggressive rhetoric, reflecting a delicate balancing act between defending national interests and avoiding further escalation.

The looming tariff threat presents a significant challenge to the global economic order. The potential impact extends far beyond BRICS members, potentially disrupting established supply chains and creating further uncertainty in the already fragile global trade environment. Economists predict significant ripple effects, impacting businesses, consumers, and potentially causing increased inflation in various sectors across the globe. While the Trump administration asserts that these measures are necessary to safeguard American interests, critics contend that such protectionist measures ultimately harm global economic growth and contribute to instability.